Trump says the US will rule Venezuela after Maduro.

Donald Trump's recent statement on Venezuela, where he claimed the US would 'govern Venezuela' after the arrest of Nicolás Maduro, explores the complex issue of... political interference in the Latin American context.

In this article, we will analyze the reactions of leaders such as Lula and María Corina, as well as the implications of handing Maduro over to Trump, including discussions about possible political interference in future events in Brazil in 2026.

Context and Statements by Donald Trump Regarding Venezuela

Donald Trump surprised the international community by stating that the United States will... "governing Venezuela" following the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

This statement, made amid already heightened tensions, marks a turning point in relations between the two countries and raises concerns about possible repercussions in the region.

Maduro was transferred to an American warship, the USS Iwo Jima, as announced by Trump on his social media.

This occurred after an operation that the US justified as part of an effort to combat drug trafficking in the Caribbean.

The operation included the movement of ships, aircraft, and troops, as detailed in a news from Globo.

Criticism quickly emerged from around the world. with leaders like Lula condemning the actions as an unacceptable line of military intervention.

María Corina, a prominent figure in the Venezuelan opposition, celebrated the capture, seeing it as a path to freedom for the country.

This scenario raises debates about the legitimacy of such intervention and suggests possible signs of US interference in the politics of other Latin American nations, such as Brazil in 2026.

Political Reactions: Lula and María Corina on Maduro's Arrest

President Lula strongly condemned the United States' bombings in Venezuela and the subsequent arrest of Nicolás Maduro, considering these actions as a 'unacceptable line' of violation of Venezuelan sovereignty.

According to Lula, the US military action represents a direct violation of international lawIn addition to setting a dangerous precedent for the South American region.

He expressed concern about the potential humanitarian and political repercussions of this intervention, highlighting the risks of a 'world of violence' that such action could unleash.

The Brazilian president's criticism aligns with a view of non-interference in the sovereignty of nations, advocated by international political figures and various governmental entities.

On the other hand, María Corina, a prominent Venezuelan opposition figure, celebrated Maduro's arrest as a transformative event for the country.

She referred to the capture as the beginning of "the hour of freedom," suggesting positive changes for Venezuela's political future.

In his words, the American intervention was seen as a direct answer Maduro's refusal to accept a peaceful solution.

This perspective is shared by several human rights activists in Venezuela, who expressed relief and hope, stating that this moment marks a historic turning point in the struggle for a democratic transition.

María Corina described the US actions as a form of justice, envisioning a new beginning for the nation and its people.

Discussions Regarding Maduro's Handover to Trump and Its Political Implications

The handover of Nicolás Maduro to Donald Trump sparked intense discussions about the political interference of the United States in Latin America.

This event represents a milestone in international relations, raising suspicions about the capacity for American influence in regional democratic processes.

According to analysts, Maduro's arrest symbolizes not only a victory for Trump's foreign policy, but also a significant blow to Chavismo, which still maintains a strong presence in Venezuela.

World leaders expressed their views through public statements, as highlighted in an analysis that can be seen in... People's Gazette.

The immediate reaction in Brazil was mixed, with opponents celebrating and parliamentarians criticizing the American move.

Political observers speculate that the US action may anticipate a potential interference in the 2026 Brazilian elections, seeking to alter the political balance on the continent.

Amid criticism and praise, the speech of María Corina, a Venezuelan opposition leader, stands out, as she celebrated Maduro's capture as a step towards... freedom of Venezuela.

In contrast, the Workers' Party classified the action as a "most serious assault of the centuryas reported by Power360.

The long-term consequences of this event are still unfolding, painting a picture of political and diplomatic tensions.

“

International Repercussions and Debates on the Legitimacy of Military Intervention

The US military operation in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro, generated varied reactions on the international stage.

The Russian Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the action, calling it a act of armed aggression [Repercussions of the Action](https://pt.euronews.com/2026/01/03/maduro-sera-julgado-nos-eua-venezuelanos-aguardam-pelos-proximos-desenvolvimentos).

Latin American countries, including Brazil, represented by former president Lula, criticized the bombings, calling them... unacceptable lineMeanwhile, Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina celebrated the capture as a step towards the country's freedom.

In the United States, the government justified the intervention based on legislation that narcoterrorism, alegando que Maduro representava uma ameaça significativa à estabilidade regional e à segurança nacional [Legislação de Narcoterrorismo nos EUA](https://www.facebook.com/radiobandeirantes/videos/eua-utilizam-legisla%C3%A7%C3%A3o-de-narcoterrorismo-para-justificar-captura-de-maduro/1236029068393959).

However, this justification faces opposition from several world leaders who see the action as a form of political interferenceespecially considering the influence of the US in the internal affairs of other nations.

Analysts discuss the legitimacy of this intervention from the perspective of international law, emphasizing that the precedent of unilateral US interventions in the Western Hemisphere could further complicate diplomatic relations.

This situation not only generates tensions, but also raises questions about the limits of sovereignty and the use of force in an increasingly interconnected world.

In short, the situation in Venezuela, marked by Maduro's arrest and US intervention, raises crucial questions about national sovereignty and... political interference in the Americas, the impact of which could be felt in the coming years.