Poverty Reduction and Methodological Criticisms

Reduced Poverty is the central theme of this article, which will analyze the recent drop in poverty in Argentina, which reached 31.6% of the population in the first half of 2025. This phenomenon, which represents a significant decrease compared to the second half of 2024, also brought to light discussions about the indigence rate and the methodology used in the measurements.

We will explore the possible causes of this reduction, including economic stabilization and criticisms surrounding the accuracy of the data and the adequacy of the basic consumption baskets used as reference.

Poverty Reduction in the First Half of 2025

The reduction of poverty in Argentina during the first half of 2025 was a landmark event.

31,6% of the population was recorded as living in poverty, marking a reduction of 6.5 percentage points compared to the second half of 2024. Along with this, the indigence rate of 6.9% represented a significant drop in relation to previous data, generating debates about the methodology used and the real improvement in living conditions, as analyzed by experts.

The following table illustrates the comparison between data from the second half of 2024 and the first half of 2025:

During this period, market stabilization and control over the devaluation of the peso were often highlighted as factors that contributed to the reduction of poverty rates in the country.

However, a more in-depth analysis of the reference baskets revealed that adjustments are needed to better reflect contemporary consumption patterns.

For more information on the methods used, check out the full article at G1 Economy.

A need to adapt the baskets highlights the importance of a continuous evaluation of the criteria to ensure a more accurate view of economic reality.

Methodological Questions about Poverty Indices

The issue of poverty rates in Argentina has generated intense debate among experts, who raise serious concerns about the methodology used to measure them.

The limitations of reference baskets, which are often outdated and inadequate for contemporary consumption patterns, can lead to an overestimation of improvements in the population's living conditions.

Therefore, it is essential to reevaluate the metrics adopted so that they reflect social and economic reality more accurately.

Updating Basic Food Baskets and Need for Adjustments

The debates on the need for adjustments to basic food baskets in Argentina in 2025 are gaining more and more strength, since the current baskets do not correspond to the real cost and consumption profile of the population today.

Experts question the methodology used to calculate poverty, highlighting that outdated baskets can significantly distort the numbers.

With constant inflation, the purchasing power of the population weakens, while food prices continue to rise, as noted in sources such as G1 News.

As consumption patterns have evolved, it is crucial that basic food baskets reflect this reality, providing a adequacy more accurate comparison of the poverty rate to contemporary living conditions.

Economic Context and Peso Stabilization

Argentina's economic outlook for 2025 reveals an important correlation between policies to contain the devaluation of the peso and reduce poverty rates.

The Argentine government played a crucial role in intervening in the exchange rate, as noted in an article by G1 on Economic Intervention, combating the rise of the dollar and bringing stability to the market.

These actions prevented an even greater flight of investors, a factor highlighted by InfoMoney on exchange rate instability, and were essential for the maintenance of purchasing power of the population, positively impacting poverty rates.

According to the latest data, the poverty fell to 31.6%, a significant reduction compared to the previous semester, as an apparent result of these economic measures.

Financial market management and foreign aid, such as the search for US support mentioned by Gauchazh on US financial aid, were key factors in this strategy to control instability.

Although some experts question the calculation methodologies and updates of basic food baskets, the perception of greater stability and the reduction of indigence rates to 6.9% reinforce the importance of the policies adopted.

In summary, the reduction of poverty in Argentina is an optimistic figure, but it should be analyzed with caution, considering the criticisms of the methodology and the need to update basic food baskets to reflect contemporary reality.